En poursuivant votre navigation sur ce site, vous acceptez l'utilisation d'un simple cookie d'identification. Aucune autre exploitation n'est faite de ce cookie. OK
0

Infection rates in surgical procedures: a comparison of cefalexin vs. a placebo.

Favoris Signaler une erreur
Article

Daude-Lagrave, A. ; Carozzo, Claude ; Fayolle, Pascal ; Viguier, Eric ; Viateau, Véronique ; Moissonnier, Pierre

Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology

Ecole Nationale Veterinaire d'Alfort, Department of Surgery, 7, avenue du general De Gaulle, 94704 Maisons-Alfort, France.

2001

98527

Volume : 14(3): 146-150

AB: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in small animal surgery. 329 dogs and 544 cats were included in a prospective, randomized, blind trial to determine the frequency of wound infection after clean and clean-contaminated surgical procedures. The animals were allocated to one of two groups: group A received a placebo and group B received cefalexin. The infection rate was measured in each group and correlated with different criteria (age, duration and type of the operation, anaesthetic and Altemeier's class, surgeon's experience). Globally, 78 cases of infection were noted (8.9%). The infection rates in the two groups were not significantly different (9.4% in group A and 8.5% in group B). Infection rate was not affected by the different criteria studied. However, the percentage of animals infected in group B tended to be lower than that of group A as the surgeons' experience increased.
Favoris Signaler une erreur